Contents
pdf Download PDF
pdf Download XML
48 Views
15 Downloads
Share this article
Research Article | Volume 11 Issue 8 (August, 2025) | Pages 929 - 934
Impact of Covid -19 Pandemic on Cervical Cancer Screening and Diagnosis- A Cross Sectional Study
 ,
 ,
1
Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, MGM Medical College, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
2
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, MGM Medical College, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
3
Fellow Reproductive Medicine at Nadkarni Medical Training Academy, Vapi, Gujarat, India
Under a Creative Commons license
Open Access
Received
July 15, 2025
Revised
Aug. 22, 2025
Accepted
Aug. 25, 2025
Published
Aug. 30, 2025
Abstract
Background: COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically impacted the health care systems, resulting in a significant decline in preventive healthcare, such as HPV vaccinations and cervical cancer screenings. Objective: To study the impact of COVID 19 pandemic on cervical cancer screening and diagnosis Materials and methods: In this cross sectional observational study, data of total number of Pap smear, HPV DNA testing, Cervical Biopsy and Colposcopy performed was collected. Tests results were recorded and compared between the pre COVID-19 and during the COVID-19 pandemic era. Results: Majority of the patients were in age between 40–59 yrs (54.16 %) with average age was 53.72 yrs. Maximum patients were presented for routine check up (37%), followed by post menopausal bleeding (2.3%), abdominal Pain (16.2%), heavy Menstrual Bleeding (10.9%) and 6% were presented with bleeding PV. Significant (82.6%) decreases in Pap smears from Pre covid to Post COVID-19.Percentage decrease in cervical biopsy was 52.2%, in HPV DNA was 95.3%, and colposcopy was 93.7% respectively. Conclusion: COVID 19 pandemic has drastically hampered screening and diagnosis of Cervical Cancer. This will not only add burden of diagnosis and management in coming period, but also cause delayed diagnosis of disease at an advanced stage, hence concerned authorities should formulate policies and organize programs for screening of cervical cancer in pandemic.
Keywords
INTRODUCTION
Cervical cancer continues to be a serious public health concern, particularly in low- and middle-income nations, where it plays a substantial role in the morbidity and mortality of cancer in women. Itis the fourth most common cancer in women worldwide. About 90% of the 342,000 cervical cancer fatalities that occurred in 2020 took place in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) [1]. Cervical cancer burden reduction techniques that have been shown to work include routine screening and early detection through programs like Pap smears and human papillomavirus (HPV) testing [2]. Cervical cancer is frequently detected only in advanced stages and with severe symptoms, and the population in LMICs has limited access to detection techniques. Furthermore, there may be limited access to malignant lesion treatment (chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery), which raises the death rate from cervical cancer in these nations [1]. A 9-week delay in treatment was expected to result in a 2.52% lifetime increase in cervical cancer-related fatalities; if treatment was further postponed for six months, the increase rose to 3.8% [3]. According to a World Health Organization (WHO) prediction, nearly two-thirds of cervical cancer occurrences will occur in LMICs, and up to 44.4 million cases might be diagnosed worldwide between 2020 and 2069 if successful interventions are not implemented [4]. Global health systems have been greatly impacted by the unexpected onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in January 2020 [5]. On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) proclaimed COVID-19 a pandemic due to its widespread distribution [6]. The National Health Service Scotland declared in March 2020 that screening services for breast, colon, and cervical cancer will no longer be offered [7]. In order to conserve resources and stop the spread of COVID-19, many regular and non-urgent services have been discontinued in the majority of countries [8]. Essential health services have been impacted in 90% of nations globally since the COVID-19 outbreak, according to the WHO's first interim report of the Pulse Survey on Continuity of Essential Health Services during the COVID-19 pandemic, which was published in August 2020 [9].Reduced access to preventive services and delays in diagnosis were caused by lockdowns, transit restrictions, fear of catching the virus, and reallocation of health resources [10]. Cervical cancer screening rates have significantly decreased throughout the epidemic, according to several research. For example, a research conducted in the United States found that cervical screening decreased by more than 80% in the first few months of the pandemic as compared to pre-pandemic values [11]. Similar patterns have been noted in other nations, underscoring the crisis's worldwide influence on vital cancer prevention programs [12]. Future incidence of advanced-stage cervical cancer cases could increase as a result of delayed screening and diagnosis, potentially undoing the gains of the past few decades. Comprehending the magnitude of this influence is essential for formulating recovery plans and preparing for upcoming public health crises. AIM: To investigate how the COVID-19 pandemic has affected cervical cancerscreeningand diagnosis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
To assess the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on cervical cancer screening and diagnosis, a cross-sectional observational study was carried out. The study was conducted over a period of one yearin the department of Obstetrics and Gynecology in Kasturba Medical College, Manipal. Study Population: Women between the ages of 21 and 70 who qualified for routine cervical cancer screening in accordance with National or WHO recommendations were included in the study. Based on the time period, participants were divided into two groups: Pre-pandemic period: [e.g., October 2019 – March 2020] Pandemic period: [e.g., April 2020 – September 2020] Inclusion criteria: • Women who underwent HPV DNA test or Pap smear test during the study period • Who provided consent for the study Exclusion criteria: • Women who have already been diagnosed with cervical cancer. • Incomplete screening or medical information • Who not provided consent for the study Data collections: Socio-demographic details(age, parity, socio-economic status) and clinical presentation were recorded. The following data were collected: Number of cervical screening tests (pap smear/HPV DNA) performed monthly. Number and stages of new cervical cancer diagnosed Changes in the number of cervical cancer screening test performed before and during COVID-19 pandemic. Change in the number of new cervical cancer diagnosed. Stage at diagnosis before versus during the pandemic. Statistical analysis: descriptive data were used to summarize demographic and clinical characteristics. Categorical variables were expressed as frequencies and percentages, continuous variables as means and standard deviation (SD). A p value <0.05 considered as statistically significant
RESULTS
Table 1: Pre COVID 19 pandemic cervical screening among study population Month (N=6) PAP Smear (N=2345) Cervical biopsy (N=46) HPV DNA (N=105) Colposcopy (N=32) OCTOBER 2019 635 11 8 6 NOVEMBER 2019 615 11 15 8 DECEMBER 2019 150 5 16 3 JANUARY 2019 332 6 25 4 FEBRUARY 2020 385 13 29 11 MARCH 2020 228 0 12 0 Table 2: Post COVID 19 pandemic cervical screening among study population Month (N=6) PAP smear (N=399) Cervical biopsy (N=22) HPV DNA (N=5) Colposcopy (N=2) APRIL 2020 1 1 0 0 MAY 2020 9 1 0 0 JUNE 2020 62 3 0 0 JULY 2020 86 7 0 0 AUGUST 2020 74 5 0 1 SEPTEMBER 2020 167 5 5 1 Table 3: Age distribution of patients screened for cervical cancerPre and Post Covid Age (yrs) Pre Covid Post Covid No. of patients (N=2391) No. of patients (N=428) < 20 96 (4%) 8 (2.5%) 20-39 710 (29.7%) 141 (33.3%) 40-59 1295 (54.16%) 218 (51.19%) 60-79 271 (11.34%) 64 (15.47%) >80 19 (0.8%) 0 (0%) The common presenting complaints in women undergoing Pap smear were, most of them came forRoutine cervical screening (37%) followed by Abdominal Pain (16.2%), Heavy Menstrual Bleeding (10.9%), Discharge PV (6%), Bleeding PV (6%), Dysmenorrhea (4.7%), Burning Micturition (3.8%), Mass PV (2.8%) and post menopausal bleeding was in 2.3% cases Number of Pap smear showing LSIL, HSIL in pre covid- 11and inpost covid- 2 Cervical cancer patients in pre covid- 23and post covid- 14. There is 39.2% decrease in the number of cervical cancer getting diagnosed from pre covid times to post covid times.
DISCUSSION
Globally, the COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly interrupted cervical cancer screening programs. All the qualified studies included for the quantitative analysis were from developed countries having organized cancer screening programs. The reduced screening coverage will be translated as a higher incidence of invasive cancers in the coming decades. In our study majority of the patients were in age between 40 –59 yrs with average age was 53.72 yrs, these finding correlates with the Miller et al, [13] and Amram O, et al [14]. This age group constituted a group of vulnerable women with an increased frequency of high-grade cytological abnormalities Clinical presentation of patients who tested positive for cervical cancer, maximum patients were presented for routine checkup. The common compliant were post menopausal bleeding, abdominal Pain, heavy Menstrual Bleeding, discharge PV and bleeding PV, our results similar to many other studies like: Chen R, et al [15] and Peng S, et al [16]. Among cervical cancer screening, most common methods were Pap smear followed by cervical biopsy, HPV DNA and colposcopy in the current study, in agreement with the N. Wentzensen et al [17] We have found that the significant decrease in the number of Pap smear testing in Post covid time period compared to pre covid time period, in consistence of TR Martins, et al [18] and Sabeena, et al [19].There was 39% decrease in the number of cervical cancer getting diagnosed from pre covid times to post covid times. This study observed that Pap smear in pre covid was significantly higher as compared to Pap smear in post covid, our result comparable with the Frederik A. et al [20] and Masson H, et al [21]. Public health measures to deal with the huge cancer screening deficits should be undertaken. During the current COVID-19 pandemic cancer screening and timely management have to be maintained while protecting thepatients and care givers [22].
CONCLUSION
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cervical cancer screening has been particularly significant. COVID 19 has drastically reduced the footfall of patients in the hospital which has evidently hampered screening and diagnosis of Cervical Cancer. This will not only add burden of diagnosis and management in coming period, but also cause delayed diagnosis of disease at an advanced stage, hence concerned authorities should formulate policies and organize programs for screening of cervical cancer in pandemic.
REFERENCES
1. World Health Organization – Cervical Can cer. [cited 2022 Apr 4]. Available from: https: //www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/de tail/cervical-cancer. 2. Arbyn, M., Weiderpass, E., Bruni, L., de Sanjosé, S., Saraiya, M., Ferlay, J., & Bray, F. (2020). Estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2018: a worldwide analysis. The Lancet Global Health, 8(2), e191-e203. 3. Gupta N, Chauhan AS, Prinja S, Pandey AK (2021). Impact of COVID-19 on Outcomes for Patients With Cervical Cancer in India. JCO Glob Oncol, 7, 716–25. 4. Simms KT, Steinberg J, Caruana M, Smith MA, Lew JB, Soerjomataram I, et al. Impact of scaled up human papillomavirus vaccination and cervical screening and the potential for global elimination of cervical cancer in 181 countries, 2020-99: a modelling study. Lancet Oncol. 2019 Mar; 20(3): 394–407. 5. N.N. Baxter, M. Facey, A. Ruco, et al., Nimble approach: Fast, adapting, calculat- ing and ethically mindful approach to managing colorectal cancer screening pro- grammes during a pandemic, BMJ Open. Gastroenterol. 9 (2022) e000826. 6. World Health Organization, Timeline: WHO’s COVID-19 response. https://www. who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/interactive-timeline#! , (ac- cessed 01 December 2023). 7. C. Campbell, T. Sommerfield, G.R.C. Clark, et al., COVID-19 and cancer screening in Scotland: A national and coordinated approach to minimising harm, Prev. Med. 151 (2021) 106606 . 8. D.M.P. Perin, T. Christensen, A. Buron, et al., Interruption of cancer screening ser- vices due to COVID-19 pandemic: Lessons from previous disasters, Prev. Med. Rep. 23 (2021) 101399 . 9. World Health Organization, Pulse survey on continuity of essential health services during the COVID-19 pandemic: Interim report, 27 August 2020. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/334048, 2020 (accessed 01 March 2022). 10. Dinmohamed, A. G., Visser, O., Verhoeven, R. H. A., Louwman, M. W. J., van Nederveen, F. H., Willems, S. M., &Merkx, M. A. W. (2020). Fewer cancer diagnoses during the COVID-19 epidemic in the Netherlands. The Lancet Oncology, 21(6), 750-751. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30265-5 11. Epic Health Research Network. (2020). Delayed cancer screenings. Retrieved from https://ehrn.org/articles/delayed-cancer-screenings/ 12. Maringe, C., Spicer, J., Morris, M., Purushotham, A., Nolte, E., Sullivan, R., & Aggarwal, A. (2020). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer deaths due to delays in diagnosis in England, UK: a national, population-based, modelling study. The Lancet Oncology, 21(8),1023-1034. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30388-0 13. Miller MJ, Lanfang Xu, Jin Q, et al (2021). Impact of COVID-19 on Cervical Cancer Screening Rates Among Women Aged 21-65 Years in a Large Integrated Health Care System - Southern California, January 1-September 30, 2019, and January 1-September 30, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 70, 109–13. 14. Amram O, Robison J, Amiri S, Pflugeisen B, Roll J, Monsivais P: Socioeconomic and racial inequities in breast cancer screening during the COVID-19 pandemic in Washington State. JAMA Network Open 4(5): e2110946, 2021. DOI: 10.1001/ jamanetworkopen.2021.109462 5. 15. Chen R, Haynes K, Du S, Barron J, Katz A: Association of cancer screening deficit in the United States with the COVID19 pandemic. JAMA Oncology 7(6): 878, 2021. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.088420 16. Peng S, Yang K, Chan W, Wang Y, Lin L, Yen A, Smith R, Chen T: Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on a population-based breast cancer screening program. Cancer 126(24): 5202-5205, 2020. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.331802 17. Nicolas Wentzensena,*, Megan A. Clarkea, Rebecca B. Perkinsb, Impact of COVID-19 on cervical cancer screening: Challenges and opportunities to improving resilience and reduce disparities, PreventiveMedicine151(2021)106596 1. 18. Toni Ricardo Martins, Steven S. Witkin, Maria Cássia Mendes-Corrêa, Amanda Scancella de Godoy, Lise Cury, Marcelo Luiz Balancin, Alexandre Muxfeldt Ab’Saber, Stela Verzinhasse Peres, Sandra Messias, Tânia Regina Tozetto Mendoza, Adhemar Longatto-Filho, Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Cervical Cancer Screening in São Paulo State, Brazil, Acta Cytologica DOI: 10.1159/000529249 18. Sasidharanpillai Sabeena*, Nagaraja Ravishankar, The Short-Term Impact Of COVID-19 Pandemic on Cervical Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, Vol 23 19. Frederik A. Stuebs, Annika S. Behrens, Anja Seibold, Werner Adler, Caro, Geppert,ARndt Hartmann, Antje Knöll, Martin C. Koch, Grit Mehlhorn, Matthias W. Beckmann1, Anna-Katharin Theuser, Carla E. Schulmeyer, Paul Gass And Anna K. Dietl, Impact of the Corona Pandemic on Cervical Cancer Screening Assessment, in vivo38: 734-740 (2024) 20. Masson H: Cervical pap smears and pandemics: The effect of COVID-19 on screening uptake & opportunities to improve. Women’s Health 17: 174550652110170, 2021. DOI: 10.1177/ 174550652110170708 21. Dewi L, Gatellier L, Sabapathy K, et al (2020). An Asian Perspective of the Management of COVID-19: the Asian National Cancer Centers Alliance Led Regional Comparison. Asian Pac J Cancer Care, 5, 27- 42.
Recommended Articles
Research Article
Analgesic Effect of Diacerein in Rats: An Acetic Acid Writhing Model Study
...
Published: 30/08/2025
Research Article
Prevalence and Risk of Concomitant Allergies in Patients Allergic To House Dust Mite – A Pilot Study from West Bengal, India
...
Published: 26/08/2025
Research Article
Comparative Analysis of the Efficacy of Esmolol 1 Mg/Kg and Dexmedetomidine 0.75 Mg/Kg in Attenuating the Hemodynamic Pressor Response to Laryngoscopy and Intubation: A Prospective Randomized Study
...
Published: 30/08/2025
Research Article
Role of Enteral Contrast in Pediatric Small Bowel Obstruction: A Multicenter Prospective Study
...
Published: 31/01/2025
Chat on WhatsApp
© Copyright Journal of Contemporary Clinical Practice